Spivey v. Battaglia Fruit Co.

142 So. 2d 3, 1962 Fla. LEXIS 2885
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 31, 1962
DocketNo. 31310
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 142 So. 2d 3 (Spivey v. Battaglia Fruit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spivey v. Battaglia Fruit Co., 142 So. 2d 3, 1962 Fla. LEXIS 2885 (Fla. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rule 3.16(e), 31 F.S.A., (Attorney’s Fees) provides “Where attorney’s fees are. allowable by law for services in the appellate court the request therefor shall be pre[4]*4sented by motion filed with the clerk of the appellate court at or before the time of filing the party’s first brief, and shall be disposed of at the time the case is disposed of on the merits, unless otherwise ordered by the court.” (Emphasis added)

In this case the first brief was filed July 5, 1961, argument heard on November 10, 1961, and decided February 21, 1962. Now at this late date, May 4, 1962, Petition has been presented for attorneys’ fees for services rendered in the presentation of the matter before this court. Obviously, this is a flagrant violation of the Florida Appellate Rule hereinabove quoted, and therefore the Petition is denied.

It is so ordered.

TERRELL, Acting C. J., and DREW, O’CONNELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and SCOTT, C. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rutkin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
214 So. 2d 99 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 So. 2d 3, 1962 Fla. LEXIS 2885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spivey-v-battaglia-fruit-co-fla-1962.