Spivak v. McMahon
275 A.D.2d 1051
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 10, 1949
StatusPublished
This text of 275 A.D.2d 1051 (Spivak v. McMahon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Spivak v. McMahon, 275 A.D.2d 1051 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).
Opinion
Plaintiff’s proof was sufficient to warrant recovery on the ground that she was the procuring cause of the sale which resulted from the agreement, on terms, between the agent of defendant and the purchaser. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Mac Crate, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
275 A.D.2d 1051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spivak-v-mcmahon-nyappdiv-1949.