Spivak v. Farkas

217 A.D.2d 430, 629 N.Y.S.2d 45, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7627
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 6, 1995·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered May 23, 1994, which in an action to recover the down payment in a contract for the sale of real property and related expenses, granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff buyer was entitled to cancel the contract without a showing of tender or ability to pay, because defendants’ title was incurably defective, constituting only seven-eighths interest in the subject property, and thus defendants were in automatic breach (see, Cohen v Kranz, 12 NY2d 242, 246, 247). Defendants’ misrepresentation in the contract that they possessed full title was a misrepresentation that also justified plaintiff’s cancellation of the contract (see, Junius Constr. Corp. v Cohen, 257 NY2d 393, 400). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spivak v. Farkas, 217 A.D.2d 430, 629 N.Y.S.2d 45, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7627 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

217 A.D.2d 430 (Spivak v. Farkas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Hicks
72 A.D.3d 1085 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Saewitz v. Epstein
6 F. Supp. 2d 151 (N.D. New York, 1998)