Spitzfaden v. Dow Corning Corp.
685 So. 2d 149, 1997 La. LEXIS 88, 1997 WL 11126
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Spitzfaden v. Dow Corning Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 La. LEXIS 2269 →
Opinion
In re Surgitek Inc.; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.; Natural Y Surgical Specialties; Aesthe-tech Corp.; Cabot Industries Inc.; Cooper Companies Inc.; CopperSurgical Inc.; CVI Merger Corporation; CY Sub 1987 Inc.; Markham Medical International; Medical Engineering Corp.; Sirod Corporation; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Corat, Div. “F”, No. 92-2589; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Nos. 96CW-2539, 96CW-2187.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Spitzfaden v. Dow Corning Corp., 685 So. 2d 149, 1997 La. LEXIS 88, 1997 WL 11126 (La. 1997).
685 So. 2d 149 (Spitzfaden v. Dow Corning Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.