Spitzer v. Meyer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Spitzer v. Meyer

198 Ill. App. 550

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedApril 12, 1916

DocketGen. No. 21,237

StatusPublished

This text of 198 Ill. App. 550 (Spitzer v. Meyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spitzer v. Meyer, 198 Ill. App. 550 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Goodwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Witnesses, § 33*—when husband competent witness for wife. The husband of a married woman is a competent witness in her behalf under section 5 of the Evidence Act (J. & A. If 5522), in a suit against the wife to recover for architect’s services. 2. Tbial, § 68*—when denial to counsel of right to make full offer of what mil be proved by witness reversible error. It is reversible error to deny to counsel the right to make fully his offer of what he intends to prove by a witness whose testimony the court has intimated an intention to exclude, although the other side objects that the offer was merely to prove what another witness had already testified to.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Goodwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Witnesses, § 33*—when husband competent witness for wife. The husband of a married woman is a competent witness in her behalf under section 5 of the Evidence Act (J. & A. If 5522), in a suit against the wife to recover for architect’s services. 2. Tbial, § 68*—when denial to counsel of right to make full offer of what mil be proved by witness reversible error. It is reversible error to deny to counsel the right to make fully his offer of what he intends to prove by a witness whose testimony the court has intimated an intention to exclude, although the other side objects that the offer was merely to prove what another witness had already testified to.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 Ill. App. 550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spitzer-v-meyer-illappct-1916.