Spitzer Akron, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

470 F.2d 1000, 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2284, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6545
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided November 27, 1972·No. 72-1187·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

This case is before the court on the petition of Spitzer Akron to review and set aside an order issued by the National Labor Relations Board, and on the Board’s cross application for enforcement. The Board’s decision is reported at 195 N.L.R.B. No. 24. Reference is made to the reported decision of the *1001 Board for a detailed recitation of the facts.

We conclude that there is substantial evidence to support the conclusion of the Board that Spitzer Akron was a successor employer and was obligated to bargain with the Union as the representative of the predecessor employer, all of whom were reemployed by Spitzer Akron. N. L. R. B. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc., 406 U.S. 272, 92 S.Ct. 1571, 32 L.Ed.2d 61 (1972); N. L. R. B. v. Wayne Convalescent Center, Inc., 465 F.2d 1039 (6th Cir. 1972).

We further conclude that all other parts of the decision of the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole.

It is ordered that the decision of the Board be enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spitzer Akron, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 470 F.2d 1000, 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2284, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6545 (6th Cir. 1972).

470 F.2d 1000 (Spitzer Akron, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harmon Ex Rel. Harmon v. Eudaily
407 A.2d 232 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1979)