Spitzer Akron, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
This text of 470 F.2d 1000 (Spitzer Akron, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
This case is before the court on the petition of Spitzer Akron to review and set aside an order issued by the National Labor Relations Board, and on the Board’s cross application for enforcement. The Board’s decision is reported at 195 N.L.R.B. No. 24. Reference is made to the reported decision of the *1001 Board for a detailed recitation of the facts.
We conclude that there is substantial evidence to support the conclusion of the Board that Spitzer Akron was a successor employer and was obligated to bargain with the Union as the representative of the predecessor employer, all of whom were reemployed by Spitzer Akron. N. L. R. B. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc., 406 U.S. 272, 92 S.Ct. 1571, 32 L.Ed.2d 61 (1972); N. L. R. B. v. Wayne Convalescent Center, Inc., 465 F.2d 1039 (6th Cir. 1972).
We further conclude that all other parts of the decision of the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole.
It is ordered that the decision of the Board be enforced.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
470 F.2d 1000, 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2284, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spitzer-akron-inc-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca6-1972.