Spitz v. State

198 A.D.2d 774, 605 N.Y.S.2d 996
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 19, 1993
DocketClaim No. 76965
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 198 A.D.2d 774 (Spitz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spitz v. State, 198 A.D.2d 774, 605 N.Y.S.2d 996 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The Court of Claims’ factual finding that the highest and best use of the subject properties was for industrial and warehouse purposes is not contrary to the weight of evidence. We perceive no reason to disturb the court’s weighing of expert testimony, especially where, as here, the court’s determination was aided by viewing the properties.

We have reviewed claimants’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Court of Claims, NeMoyer, J. — Appropriation.) Present — Den-man, P. J., Callahan, Balio, Boomer and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Siebert v. State
198 A.D.2d 774 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 A.D.2d 774, 605 N.Y.S.2d 996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spitz-v-state-nyappdiv-1993.