Spitalieri v. State

72 So. 3d 154, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10654, 2011 WL 2650857
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 8, 2011
DocketNo. 5D10-232
StatusPublished

This text of 72 So. 3d 154 (Spitalieri v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spitalieri v. State, 72 So. 3d 154, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10654, 2011 WL 2650857 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Eugenio Spitalieri’s convictions of two counts of manslaughter with a firearm and the consecutive fifteen-year sentences imposed as a consequence. See Contreras-Mayahua v. State, 40 So.3d 861 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

We accept the State’s concession of error regarding Spitalieri’s motion to correct his sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). The State concedes that Spitalieri is entitled to 586 days of credit for time served instead of the 583 days that the court awarded. The State further concedes that the $1 First Step and $30 drug testing costs must be stricken as they are discretionary costs and were not orally pronounced. See State v. Williams, 712 So.2d 762 (Fla.1998). For the same reason, the $250 fine imposed under section 775.083(1), Florida Statutes (2010), shall be stricken. See Dadds v. State, 946 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).1 On remand, Spitalieri’s sentencing documents shall be corrected. No resentencing is necessary.

Convictions AFFIRMED; REMANDED for Correction of Sentence.

ORFINGER, C.J., GRIFFIN and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grubb v. State
922 So. 2d 1002 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
State v. Williams
712 So. 2d 762 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Dadds v. State
946 So. 2d 1129 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Contreras-Mayahua v. State
40 So. 3d 861 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Velez-Pizzini v. State
58 So. 3d 278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 So. 3d 154, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10654, 2011 WL 2650857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spitalieri-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.