Spiselman v. Empire State Dental Group, P. C.

680 N.E.2d 614, 89 N.Y.2d 1027, 658 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 507
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 1, 1997
StatusPublished

This text of 680 N.E.2d 614 (Spiselman v. Empire State Dental Group, P. C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spiselman v. Empire State Dental Group, P. C., 680 N.E.2d 614, 89 N.Y.2d 1027, 658 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 507 (N.Y. 1997).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as dismissed appellants’ appeal from the Supreme Court order denying their motion to vacate the judgment, dismissed upon the ground that that part of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
680 N.E.2d 614, 89 N.Y.2d 1027, 658 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spiselman-v-empire-state-dental-group-p-c-ny-1997.