Spiro v. Maiman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Spiro v. Maiman

94 N.Y.S. 358

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 94 N.Y.S. 358 (Spiro v. Maiman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spiro v. Maiman, 94 N.Y.S. 358 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinions

SCOTT, P. J.

There is abundant evidence that plaintiff never accepted the $200 note which was left with him. He took it, believing it to have been properly indorsed, and, as soon as he found that it was not, he objected that it was not what he had agreed to take. Of course, he is bound to return it on demand, but no demand has been made.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

DUGRO, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCOTT, P. J.

There is abundant evidence that plaintiff never accepted the $200 note which was left with him. He took it, believing it to have been properly indorsed, and, as soon as he found that it was not, he objected that it was not what he had agreed to take. Of course, he is bound to return it on demand, but no demand has been made.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

DUGRO, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 N.Y.S. 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spiro-v-maiman-nyappterm-1905.