Spiro v. Maiman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Spiro v. Maiman

94 N.Y.S. 358

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 22, 1905·Published

Opinions

SCOTT, P. J.

There is abundant evidence that plaintiff never accepted the $200 note which was left with him. He took it, believing it to have been properly indorsed, and, as soon as he found that it was not, he objected that it was not what he had agreed to take. Of course, he is bound to return it on demand, but no demand has been made.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

DUGRO, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCOTT, P. J.

There is abundant evidence that plaintiff never accepted the $200 note which was left with him. He took it, believing it to have been properly indorsed, and, as soon as he found that it was not, he objected that it was not what he had agreed to take. Of course, he is bound to return it on demand, but no demand has been made.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

DUGRO, J., concurs.

Spiro v. Maiman, 94 N.Y.S. 358 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

94 N.Y.S. 358 (Spiro v. Maiman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.