Spires v. Bottorff
This text of 102 N.E.2d 761 (Spires v. Bottorff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner filed his verified motion seeking a writ of mandate against respondent to compel him to perform certain acts relating to matters allegedly pending in the Clark Circuit Court.
Petitioner has failed to comply with Rule 2-35 of this court, 1949 Revision, which provides for the filing of certified copies of all pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject matter, and the petition herein is, therefore, dismissed.
Note.—Reported in 102 N. E. 2d 761.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 N.E.2d 761, 230 Ind. 230, 1952 Ind. LEXIS 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spires-v-bottorff-ind-1952.