Spira v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Spira v. New York City Housing Authority

31 A.D.3d 427, 817 N.Y.S.2d 511

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 5, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.3d 427 (Spira v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spira v. New York City Housing Authority, 31 A.D.3d 427, 817 N.Y.S.2d 511 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judg[428]*428ment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), entered May 9, 2001, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability, is in favor of the defendant and against her, dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

A jury verdict should not be set aside as against the weight of the evidence unless the jury could not have reached its verdict by any fair interpretation of the evidence (see Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129 [1985]). In this case, the jury’s verdict in favor of the defendant was not against the weight of the evidence. Ritter, J.P., Krausman, Lifson and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judg[428]*428ment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), entered May 9, 2001, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability, is in favor of the defendant and against her, dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

A jury verdict should not be set aside as against the weight of the evidence unless the jury could not have reached its verdict by any fair interpretation of the evidence (see Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129 [1985]). In this case, the jury’s verdict in favor of the defendant was not against the weight of the evidence. Ritter, J.P., Krausman, Lifson and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.3d 427, 817 N.Y.S.2d 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spira-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack