Spinney v. Field

17 N.Y.S. 890, 43 N.Y. St. Rep. 766, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 567
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 18, 1892
StatusPublished

This text of 17 N.Y.S. 890 (Spinney v. Field) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spinney v. Field, 17 N.Y.S. 890, 43 N.Y. St. Rep. 766, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 567 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Opinion

Van Brunt, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order granting a commission upon the ground that the commissioner named is an improper person. The only suggestion upon which is based the impropriety of his selection is that his name was suggested by the witness. That the commissioner has any' relations with the plaintiff or the witness is not shown; and the plaintiff’s attorney frankly told defendants that the name had been suggested by the witness. Without something more substantial than mere suspicion, in view of the difficulty in getting a commissioner, we do not think the order should be interfered with. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 N.Y.S. 890, 43 N.Y. St. Rep. 766, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spinney-v-field-nysupct-1892.