Spinks v. Second Nat. Bank of Washington
214 F.2d 853
Opinions
This appeal is from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia which construed a codicil to a will. We think the trial judge’s construction of the testator’s language was correct for the reasons given in his opinion, 1953, 122 F.Supp. 153.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Spinks v. Second Nat. Bank of Washington, 214 F.2d 853 (2d Cir. 1954).
214 F.2d 853 (Spinks v. Second Nat. Bank of Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lewis v. United States
348 U.S. 419 (Supreme Court, 1955)