Spink v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Spink v. State

465 S.W.3d 75, 2015 WL 3959988

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 2015·No. No. ED 102119·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kerri D. Spink appeals the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. • We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kerri D. Spink appeals the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. • We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Spink v. State, 465 S.W.3d 75, 2015 WL 3959988 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

465 S.W.3d 75 (Spink v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.