Spink v. Lockheed Corporation
This text of 105 F.3d 1320 (Spink v. Lockheed Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 828
Paul L. SPINK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
LOCKHEED CORPORATION; Daniel M. Tellep; Robert A. Furman;
Vincent N. Marafino; K.H. Anderson; L. Bernard; R.W.
Berry; P.N. Braun-Agel; D.L. Bronco; R.H. Northcutt;
W.E. Skowronski; A.G. Van Shaick; W.T. Vincent,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-56094.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 29, 1997.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. D.C. No. CV-92-0800-SWV.
Before D.W. NELSON, REINHARDT, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.
Prior report: 116 S.Ct. 1783, 60 F.3d 616
Plaintiff-Appellant's petition for rehearing, suggestion for rehearing en banc, and request for recall of mandate, received September 23, 1996, is ordered filed.
Plaintiff-Appellant's request for recall of mandate is GRANTED.
The defendants-appellees shall file a response to the plaintiff-appellant's petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc. Said response shall not exceed fourteen (14) pages and shall be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date this order is filed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
105 F.3d 1320, 97 Daily Journal DAR 1085, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 828, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 1795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spink-v-lockheed-corporation-ca9-1997.