Spinetti v. Brignardello

53 Cal. 281
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1878·No. No. 5552·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court, McKinstry, J.:

This is. an appeal from a final judgment, and the only “ papers ” we can consider—inasmuch as there is no bill of exceptions—are the notice of appeal and judgment roll. (Code of Civil Procedure, sec. 950.) The stipulation printed in the transcript is no part of the judgment roll, but the roll includes only the complaint, demurrer, order on demurrer, and judgment. (Code of Civil Procedure, sec. 670.)

The judgment was entered, as appears by the recital therein, “ on reading and filing the stipulation of the respective partios ” —that is, by consent. Such consent was a waiver of the demurrer, and we are not called upon, therefore, to determine whether the demurrer was well taken.

No other question is presented by the record.

Judgment affirmed, with ten per cent, damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spinetti v. Brignardello, 53 Cal. 281 (Cal. 1878).

53 Cal. 281 (Spinetti v. Brignardello) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wall v. Superior Court
89 P.2d 624 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1939)
Berkeley Bank of Savings & Trust Co. v. Miller
137 P. 1101 (California Court of Appeal, 1913)
Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. Russell
60 P. 40 (California Supreme Court, 1900)
Smith v. Lorenz
57 P. 381 (California Supreme Court, 1899)