Spinelli v. POMPANO LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC.
This text of 48 So. 3d 65 (Spinelli v. POMPANO LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ANGELA SPINELLI, Appellant,
v.
POMPANO LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC., Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Barbara J. Compiani and Jane Kreusler-Walsh of Kreusler-Walsh, Compiani & Vargas, P.A., and Christopher M. Larmoyeux of Larmoyeux & Bone, P.L., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Dinah Stein and Mary Hicks of Hicks, Porter, Ebenfeld & Stein, P.A., Miami, Gerard A. Tuzzio and Laura Bedard of Roberts, Reynolds, Bedard & Tuzzio, P.A., Coral Springs, and Walter G. Latimer of Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, Miami, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
TAYLOR, CIKLIN, JJ., and TOWBIN-SINGER, MICHELE, Associate Judge, concur.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 So. 3d 65, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spinelli-v-pompano-lincoln-mercury-inc-fladistctapp-2010.