Spinelli v. McMullen, Snare & Treist, Inc.

148 N.Y.S. 211
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 18, 1914·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The service of a notice in conformity to the statute was a condition precedent to the plaintiff's right to recover. The alleged notice served did not comply with the statute. Logerto v. Central Building Co., 198 N. Y. 390, 91 N. E. 782.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spinelli v. McMullen, Snare & Treist, Inc., 148 N.Y.S. 211 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

148 N.Y.S. 211 (Spinelli v. McMullen, Snare & Treist, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Logerto v. . Central Building Co.
91 N.E. 782 (New York Court of Appeals, 1910)