Spinelli v. McMullen, Snare & Treist, Inc.
148 N.Y.S. 211
This text of 148 N.Y.S. 211 (Spinelli v. McMullen, Snare & Treist, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Spinelli v. McMullen, Snare & Treist, Inc., 148 N.Y.S. 211 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
Opinion
The service of a notice in conformity to the statute was a condition precedent to the plaintiff's right to recover. The alleged notice served did not comply with the statute. Logerto v. Central Building Co., 198 N. Y. 390, 91 N. E. 782.
Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Logerto v. . Central Building Co.
91 N.E. 782 (New York Court of Appeals, 1910)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
148 N.Y.S. 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spinelli-v-mcmullen-snare-treist-inc-nyappterm-1914.