Spinelli, A., Jr. v. Kane, K.
This text of Spinelli, A., Jr. v. Kane, K. (Spinelli, A., Jr. v. Kane, K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
ANTHONY SPINELLI, JR., : No. 184 MM 2015 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : KATHLEEN G. KANE, ATTORNEY : GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH : OF PENNSYLVANIA, LAWRENCE M. : CHERBA, EXECUTIVE DEPUTY : ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : LAURA A. DITKA, CHIEF DEPUTY : ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 5th day of February, 2016, the King’s Bench Petition and/or
Application for Extraordinary Relief is DENIED.
Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this
matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Spinelli, A., Jr. v. Kane, K., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spinelli-a-jr-v-kane-k-pa-2016.