Spindle v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 473, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 414
United States Customs Court·Decided June 4, 1953·No. No. 57384; petition 6822-R (Laredo)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It appeared that there was no advance in the entered value of the lubricating grease, the undervaluation occurring only with reference to the metal containers therefor. The petitioner testified that he had made all of the entries involved; that he had inquired as to the value of the lubricating grease and of the drums, and it was his practice to keep informed of the market values through correspondence and in person with the manager of the exporting concern; and that on receipt of such information, he would pass such data on to the appraiser. Upon the record presented, it was held that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive-the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spindle v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 473, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 414 (cusc 1953).

30 Cust. Ct. 473 (Spindle v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.