Spinale v. United States Department of Agriculture
This text of 356 F. App'x 465 (Spinale v. United States Department of Agriculture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff-Appellants appeal from the district court’s April 2, 2009 order dismissing their claims of defamation; deprivation of inspection rights under the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, 7 U.S.C. § 1621 et seq., in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and retaliation based on Anthony Spinale’s exercise of his First Amendment Rights. The district court dismissed the complaint for a lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on sovereign immunity and a failure to state a claim. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, procedural history, and specification of issues on appeal.
After reviewing the issues on appeal and the record of proceedings below, we affirm for substantially the same reasons articulated by the district court in its thoughtful and well-reasoned order and opinion.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
356 F. App'x 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spinale-v-united-states-department-of-agriculture-ca2-2009.