Spinale v. 10 West 66th Street Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Spinale v. 10 West 66th Street Corp.

210 A.D.2d 85, 621 N.Y.S.2d 840

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 13, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 210 A.D.2d 85 (Spinale v. 10 West 66th Street Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spinale v. 10 West 66th Street Corp., 210 A.D.2d 85, 621 N.Y.S.2d 840 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered March 15, 1994, which, in a proceeding by petitioner tenant shareholder to compel respondent cooperative to permit her to inspect corporate books and records, insofar as appealed from, denied petitioner’s request for attorneys’ fees, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner’s application to inspect respondent’s books and records was granted on the basis of her right thereto under the common law and Business Corporation Law § 624, no finding having been made that such a right also existed under the proprietary lease. Absent a finding of a lease violation by respondent, petitioner has no right to attorneys’ fees under Real Property Law § 234. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered March 15, 1994, which, in a proceeding by petitioner tenant shareholder to compel respondent cooperative to permit her to inspect corporate books and records, insofar as appealed from, denied petitioner’s request for attorneys’ fees, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner’s application to inspect respondent’s books and records was granted on the basis of her right thereto under the common law and Business Corporation Law § 624, no finding having been made that such a right also existed under the proprietary lease. Absent a finding of a lease violation by respondent, petitioner has no right to attorneys’ fees under Real Property Law § 234. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 A.D.2d 85, 621 N.Y.S.2d 840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spinale-v-10-west-66th-street-corp-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack