Spin Master, Ltd. v. Aomore-US

S.D. New York

Spin Master, Ltd. v. Aomore-US

DecidedSeptember 30, 2025

Docket1:23-cv-07099

StatusUnknown

This text of Spin Master, Ltd. v. Aomore-US (Spin Master, Ltd. v. Aomore-US) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spin Master, Ltd. v. Aomore-US, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

Andrew D. Skale I 3580 Carmel Mountain Road 858 314 1506 Suite 300 adskale@mintz.com San Diego, CA 92130 i 858 314 1500 mintz.com MINTZ December 26, 2024 Honorable Judge Dale E. Ho United States District Judge Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square, Court Room 905 New York, NY 10007 Re: — Spin Master, Ltd. v. Aomore-US, Case No. 23 Civ. 7099 (DEH), Request to Maintain Sealing of Plaintiff's Confidential Sales Data Dear Judge Ho: On behalf of plaintiff Spin Master, Ltd. (“Spin Master”), we write pursuant to the Court’s Rule 6(d) to request that the Court maintain the redaction of Plaintiff's confidential sales figures for the same reason that it previously sealed this data. See ECF 127. As Defendants have indicated by letter dated December 23, 2024 (ECF 151), page 19 of their opposition includes a reference to the sales data that Plaintiff sought to seal in connection with its opening papers on its renewed motion for a preliminary imyjunction. The Court previously authorized the redaction of Spin Master’s sales information. See ECF 127 (citing Kewazinga Corp. v. Microsoft Corp., No. 18 Civ. 4500, 2021 WL 1222122, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2021) (“[C]ommonly sealed documents include those containing . . . revenue information, pricing information, and the like[.]”); Skyline Steel, LLC v. PilePro, LLC, 101 F. Supp. 3d 394, 412 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) (sealing “highly confidential sales information, including pricing information”’); Avocent Redmond Corp. v. Raritan Americas, Inc., No. 10 Civ. 6100, 2012 WL 3114855, at *16 (S.D.N.Y. July 31, 2012) (allowing documents containing confidential business information, including sales and profit margins, to be filed under seal as the disclosure of such information “would cause competitive harm”)). Defendants assert (ECF 151 at 1) that the sales figures specific to one toy should not be deemed confidential because Spin Master “publicly reports it revenue information.” However, the public filings that Defendants cite do not include revenue attributable to specific products. At most, revenue is broken down between toys and digital products (see ECF 155-10 at 16) and, as to toys, between “Preschool and Dolls & Interactive,” “Activities, Games & Puzzles and Plush,” “Wheels & Action,” and “Outdoor” (ECF 155-11 at 4). Thus, the detailed sales figures specific to the product at issue in this case are confidential.

BOSTON LOSANGELES MIAMI NEWYORK SANDIEGO SAN FRANCISCO TORONTO WASHINGTON MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.

MINTZ fl December 6, 2024 Page 2 MINTZ

Accordingly, Spin Master requests that the Court maintain the redaction and/or sealing of these sales figures. Respectfully submitted, fia , = Andrew D. Skale Member ce: Counsel of Record (via ecf)

512619458v.1

Application GRANTED. For substantially the reasons set forth in the endorsed letter, Plaintiff's reques maintain ECF No. 152 under seal is granted. A redacted version of this document may be found on the public docket at ECF No. 153. The Court finds that the proposed redactions are narrowly tailored to ser interests sufficient to rebut the presumption of public access. See Order, ECF No. 127. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate ECF No. 157. SO ORDERED.

Dale E. Ho United States District Judge Dated: September 30, 2025 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrew D. Skale I 3580 Carmel Mountain Road 858 314 1506 Suite 300 adskale@mintz.com San Diego, CA 92130 i 858 314 1500 mintz.com MINTZ December 26, 2024 Honorable Judge Dale E. Ho United States District Judge Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square, Court Room 905 New York, NY 10007 Re: — Spin Master, Ltd. v. Aomore-US, Case No. 23 Civ. 7099 (DEH), Request to Maintain Sealing of Plaintiff's Confidential Sales Data Dear Judge Ho: On behalf of plaintiff Spin Master, Ltd. (“Spin Master”), we write pursuant to the Court’s Rule 6(d) to request that the Court maintain the redaction of Plaintiff's confidential sales figures for the same reason that it previously sealed this data. See ECF 127. As Defendants have indicated by letter dated December 23, 2024 (ECF 151), page 19 of their opposition includes a reference to the sales data that Plaintiff sought to seal in connection with its opening papers on its renewed motion for a preliminary imyjunction. The Court previously authorized the redaction of Spin Master’s sales information. See ECF 127 (citing Kewazinga Corp. v. Microsoft Corp., No. 18 Civ. 4500, 2021 WL 1222122, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2021) (“[C]ommonly sealed documents include those containing . . . revenue information, pricing information, and the like[.]”); Skyline Steel, LLC v. PilePro, LLC, 101 F. Supp. 3d 394, 412 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) (sealing “highly confidential sales information, including pricing information”’); Avocent Redmond Corp. v. Raritan Americas, Inc., No. 10 Civ. 6100, 2012 WL 3114855, at *16 (S.D.N.Y. July 31, 2012) (allowing documents containing confidential business information, including sales and profit margins, to be filed under seal as the disclosure of such information “would cause competitive harm”)). Defendants assert (ECF 151 at 1) that the sales figures specific to one toy should not be deemed confidential because Spin Master “publicly reports it revenue information.” However, the public filings that Defendants cite do not include revenue attributable to specific products. At most, revenue is broken down between toys and digital products (see ECF 155-10 at 16) and, as to toys, between “Preschool and Dolls & Interactive,” “Activities, Games & Puzzles and Plush,” “Wheels & Action,” and “Outdoor” (ECF 155-11 at 4). Thus, the detailed sales figures specific to the product at issue in this case are confidential.