Spilter v. Guy
This text of 58 S.E. 769 (Spilter v. Guy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This day came again the parties by counsel, and the court, having maturely considered the transcript of the record of the petition aforesaid and arguments of counsel, is of opinion that the petitioners have an adequate remedy by virtue of sections-86 and 83a of the Code of Virginia of 1904, and upon the authority of Eubank v. Boughton, 98 Va. 499, 36 S. E. 529, the prayer of the petitioners for a writ of mandamus js denied; and it is ordered that the respondents recover of the petitioners their-costs in their behalf expended.
Mandamus refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 S.E. 769, 107 Va. 811, 1907 Va. LEXIS 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spilter-v-guy-va-1907.