Spilter v. Guy
58 S.E. 769, 107 Va. 811, 1907 Va. LEXIS 83
Opinion
This day came again the parties by counsel, and the court, having maturely considered the transcript of the record of the petition aforesaid and arguments of counsel, is of opinion that the petitioners have an adequate remedy by virtue of sections-86 and 83a of the Code of Virginia of 1904, and upon the authority of Eubank v. Boughton, 98 Va. 499, 36 S. E. 529, the prayer of the petitioners for a writ of mandamus js denied; and it is ordered that the respondents recover of the petitioners their-costs in their behalf expended.
Mandamus refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Spilter v. Guy, 58 S.E. 769, 107 Va. 811, 1907 Va. LEXIS 83 (Va. 1907).
58 S.E. 769 (Spilter v. Guy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fleenor v. Dorton
47 S.E.2d 329 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1948)