Spillman v. State

292 S.W. 891, 106 Tex. Crim. 455, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 195
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 2, 1927·No. No. 10727.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction of an aggravated assault, punishment thirty days in the county jail.

*456 There are two bills of exception. The first shows appellant’s objection to testimony by the alleged injured party that appellant had assaulted him a couple of weeks before the assault which forms the basis for this prosecution. No citation of authorities is needed to support the proposition that proof of former grudges and prior ill-will and difficulties between the parties is admissible.

The other bill of exceptions was taken to testimony of a witness to the effect that at the time of the alleged assault herein witness could smell the odor of intoxicating liquor upon appellant’s breath. Such testimony was plainly admissible.

A discussion of the facts seems unnecessary. They are ample to support the judgment.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spillman v. State, 292 S.W. 891, 106 Tex. Crim. 455, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 195 (Tex. 1927).

292 S.W. 891 (Spillman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Turner v. State
527 S.W.2d 580 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1975)
Prather v. State
81 S.W.2d 1012 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Tyler v. State
81 S.W.2d 686 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Rayburn v. State
81 S.W.2d 96 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)