Spillman v. Spillman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Spillman v. Spillman

67 A.D.2d 942, 413 N.Y.S.2d 207, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10717

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 13, 1979

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 67 A.D.2d 942 (Spillman v. Spillman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spillman v. Spillman, 67 A.D.2d 942, 413 N.Y.S.2d 207, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10717 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding for support pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, entered November 10, 1975, which dismissed the petition. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, petition granted and proceeding remanded to the Family Court, [943]*943Rockland County, for entry of an appropriate order after a determination as to arrears in support payments. On the record before this court, the respondent did not meet his burden of proving that the petitioner’s relationship with another man met the requirements of section 248 of the Domestic Relations Law, by which the court could modify the judgment of divorce by eliminating the alimony provisions (see Northrup v Northrup, 43 NY2d 566). Rabin, J. P., Shapiro, Cohalan and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding for support pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County, entered November 10, 1975, which dismissed the petition. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, petition granted and proceeding remanded to the Family Court, [943]*943Rockland County, for entry of an appropriate order after a determination as to arrears in support payments. On the record before this court, the respondent did not meet his burden of proving that the petitioner’s relationship with another man met the requirements of section 248 of the Domestic Relations Law, by which the court could modify the judgment of divorce by eliminating the alimony provisions (see Northrup v Northrup, 43 NY2d 566). Rabin, J. P., Shapiro, Cohalan and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 A.D.2d 942, 413 N.Y.S.2d 207, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spillman-v-spillman-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack