Home/New York Court of Appeals/Spillman v. Spillman

Spillman v. Spillman

402 N.E.2d 1172, 49 N.Y.2d 745, 426 N.Y.S.2d 271, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2112
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 7, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 402 N.E.2d 1172 (Spillman v. Spillman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spillman v. Spillman, 402 N.E.2d 1172, 49 N.Y.2d 745, 426 N.Y.S.2d 271, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2112 (N.Y. 1980).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated by that court. In addition we cannot say that the Appellate Division’s conclusion that the reconstructed record was adequate for its review was erroneous as a matter of law.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Carrara
241 A.D.2d 716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Salas v. Salas
128 A.D.2d 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Brown v. Brown
122 A.D.2d 762 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Smith v. Smith
88 A.D.2d 658 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
402 N.E.2d 1172, 49 N.Y.2d 745, 426 N.Y.S.2d 271, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spillman-v-spillman-ny-1980.