Spillman v. Spillman
402 N.E.2d 1172, 49 N.Y.2d 745, 426 N.Y.S.2d 271, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2112
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated by that court. In addition we cannot say that the Appellate Division’s conclusion that the reconstructed record was adequate for its review was erroneous as a matter of law.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Spillman v. Spillman, 402 N.E.2d 1172, 49 N.Y.2d 745, 426 N.Y.S.2d 271, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2112 (N.Y. 1980).
402 N.E.2d 1172 (Spillman v. Spillman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Claim of Carrara
241 A.D.2d 716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Salas v. Salas
128 A.D.2d 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Brown v. Brown
122 A.D.2d 762 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Smith v. Smith
88 A.D.2d 658 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)