Spillino Vs. Warden
This text of Spillino Vs. Warden (Spillino Vs. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MICHAEL ANTHONY SPILLINO, No. 81587 Appellant, vs. PERRY RUSSELL, WARDEN; !MED WSCC/NDOC, CWS 1 HENLET; WSCC/NDOC, C/O HERNANDEZ; CIO AUG t 120 LENNON NDOC; AND MED. DIR. A. BROM
JOHN DOE, Respondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order regarding a motion for clarification. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James E. Wilson, Judge. No statute or court rule allows an appeal from an order regarding clarification. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule"). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
041;%.$CK.4
Stiglich Silver cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Michael Anthony Spillino Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
lin I n47A 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Spillino Vs. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spillino-vs-warden-nev-2020.