Spillino Vs. Warden

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided August 14, 2020·No. 81587·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MICHAEL ANTHONY SPILLINO, No. 81587 Appellant,

vs.

PERRY RUSSELL, WARDEN; !MED WSCC/NDOC, CWS 1 HENLET; WSCC/NDOC, C/O HERNANDEZ; CIO AUG t 120 LENNON NDOC; AND MED. DIR. A. BROM

JOHN DOE, Respondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order regarding a motion for clarification. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James E. Wilson, Judge.

No statute or court rule allows an appeal from an order regarding clarification. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule"). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

041;%.$CK.4

Stiglich Silver cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Michael Anthony Spillino Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

lin I n47A 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spillino Vs. Warden, (Neb. 2020).

Spillino Vs. Warden (Spillino Vs. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC
301 P.3d 850 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2013)