Spillers, Joseph Edward

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 15, 2016
DocketWR-85,140-01
StatusPublished

This text of Spillers, Joseph Edward (Spillers, Joseph Edward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spillers, Joseph Edward, (Tex. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-85,140-01& WR-85,140-02

EX PARTE JOSEPH EDWARD SPILLERS, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 12CR0829 & 12CR0828 IN THE 405TH DISTRICT COURT FROM GALVESTON COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession

of a controlled substance and burglary of a building and was sentenced to twenty-five and four years’

imprisonment, respectively. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Spillers v.

State, Nos. 14-13-00331-CR & 14-13-00332-CR (Tex. App.—Houston Aug. 20, 2014)(not

designated for publication).

Applicant contends that an enhancement used for these cases was improper, therefore his 2

sentences are illegal. He also contends that counsel should have investigated the improper

enhancement and challenged it both at trial and on direct appeal.

The second enhancement paragraph listed on both indictments treated a state jail felony as

if it were a felony conviction to use as part of a habitual enhancement. This Court has held that

using a state jail felony, even if the punishment for that offense had been enhanced, as if it were a

felony conviction for enhancement purposes, is improper after the change in the Penal Code dated

September 1, 2011. Samaripas v. State, 454 S.W.3d 1 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Applicant’s

sentences were therefore not properly enhanced.

Relief is granted. The punishments in Cause Nos. 12CR0829 & 12CR0828 in the 405th

District Court of Galveston County are set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the

Sheriff of Galveston to await new punishment hearings in these causes. The trial court shall issue

any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: June 15, 2016 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Samaripas v. State
454 S.W.3d 1 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Spillers, Joseph Edward, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spillers-joseph-edward-texcrimapp-2016.