Spiller v. . Spiller

Superior Court of North Carolina

Spiller v. . Spiller

2 N.C. 482

Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided April 5, 1797·Published

Opinion

We have ordered sequestrations of this kind when we have found the defendant withdrawing his property, or being about to move it and himself to avoid an execution of the decree; but not otherwise. It would be a great stretch of power in this Court to order a sequestration, or a bond for the absolute performance of the decree, whenever a bill is filed against a man by one who claims to be his wife.

See Anonymous, ante, 347.

Cited: Crews v. Crews, 175 N.C. 170.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

We have ordered sequestrations of this kind when we have found the defendant withdrawing his property, or being about to move it and himself to avoid an execution of the decree; but not otherwise. It would be a great stretch of power in this Court to order a sequestration, or a bond for the absolute performance of the decree, whenever a bill is filed against a man by one who claims to be his wife.

See Anonymous, ante, 347.

Cited: Crews v. Crews, 175 N.C. 170.

Spiller v. . Spiller, 2 N.C. 482 (N.C. Ct. App. 1797).

Pincite

2 N.C. 482 (Spiller v. . Spiller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.