Spila v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

149 A.D. 961, 134 N.Y.S. 1147

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed,upon reargument, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred; Woodward, J., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spila v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 149 A.D. 961, 134 N.Y.S. 1147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

149 A.D. 961 (Spila v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.