Spikes (James) v. Fauver (William H.), Edmiston (Robert D.), Hester, Balicki (Robert), Mee (Donald), Robinson (Glenn), Phillips (k.j.), Mears (Joseph)
This text of 935 F.2d 1282 (Spikes (James) v. Fauver (William H.), Edmiston (Robert D.), Hester, Balicki (Robert), Mee (Donald), Robinson (Glenn), Phillips (k.j.), Mears (Joseph)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
935 F.2d 1282
Spikes (James)
v.
Fauver (William H.), Edmiston (Robert D.), Hester, Balicki
(Robert), Mee (Donald), Robinson (Glenn), Phillips
(K.J.), Mears (Joseph),
NO. 90-5780
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
MAY 15, 1991
Appeal From: D.N.J.,
Brotman, J.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
935 F.2d 1282, 1991 WL 95412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spikes-james-v-fauver-william-h-edmiston-robert-d--ca3-1991.