Spigner v. Austin

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 31, 2002
• Docket: 02-7184
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7184

ROBERT F. SPIGNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHARLES AUSTIN, Chief of the City of Columbia; BOB COBLE, Mayor of Columbia; T. C. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR; SHERIFF’S DEPUTY; LEON LOTT, Sheriff of Richland County; P. O.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA- 01-49-3)

Submitted: October 24, 2002 Decided: October 31, 2002

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert F. Spigner, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Gordon Cooper, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina; Alice Price Adams, David Leon Morrison, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Robert F. Spigner appeals the district court’s order accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Spigner v. Austin, No. CA-01-

49-3 (D.S.C. June 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED