Spigener v. Crews

97 S.E. 838, 111 S.C. 281, 1919 S.C. LEXIS 12
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJanuary 1, 1919
Docket10102
StatusPublished

This text of 97 S.E. 838 (Spigener v. Crews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spigener v. Crews, 97 S.E. 838, 111 S.C. 281, 1919 S.C. LEXIS 12 (S.C. 1919).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chirr Justice Gary.

This case involves the right of homestead. The facts, are stated in the order of his Honor, the Circuit Judge, who denied such right.

The only case sustaining his ruling is Yoe v. Hanvey, 25 S. C. 94, which was overruled in Ex parte Worley, 54 S. C. 208, 32 S. E. 307, 71 Am. St. Rep. 783. In the last mentioned case the Court announced that the correct view upon the subject was expressed by Mr. Chief Justice McIver in Yoe v. Hanvey, supra.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex parte Worley
32 S.E. 307 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 S.E. 838, 111 S.C. 281, 1919 S.C. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spigener-v-crews-sc-1919.