Spiezia v. Beach 51st Street Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Spiezia v. Beach 51st Street Realty Corp.

4 A.D.2d 757, 164 N.Y.S.2d 513, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4880

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 1, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 4 A.D.2d 757 (Spiezia v. Beach 51st Street Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spiezia v. Beach 51st Street Realty Corp., 4 A.D.2d 757, 164 N.Y.S.2d 513, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from a judgment dismissing the complaint after trial by the court without a jury. Respondent orally engaged appellant to paint the trim on 10 bungalows owned by it at $16 for each. Respondent furnished the paint and paint thinner and permitted appellant to use a ladder left by a roofing company which had recently completed repairs on the roofs of the bungalows. Appellant attached a burlap bag, furnished by respondent, to a hook which appellant had inserted in an attic window frame near the peak of one of the bungalows. He held on to the bag with one hand while he used a paintbush with the other. He was injured when the bag tore and he was precipitated to the ground from the roof of the porch on which he had been standing. The trial court found that respondent had furnished the burlap bag to be used only as a dropcloth to catch paint drippings. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock,. Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ. [See post, p. 836.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from a judgment dismissing the complaint after trial by the court without a jury. Respondent orally engaged appellant to paint the trim on 10 bungalows owned by it at $16 for each. Respondent furnished the paint and paint thinner and permitted appellant to use a ladder left by a roofing company which had recently completed repairs on the roofs of the bungalows. Appellant attached a burlap bag, furnished by respondent, to a hook which appellant had inserted in an attic window frame near the peak of one of the bungalows. He held on to the bag with one hand while he used a paintbush with the other. He was injured when the bag tore and he was precipitated to the ground from the roof of the porch on which he had been standing. The trial court found that respondent had furnished the burlap bag to be used only as a dropcloth to catch paint drippings. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock,. Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ. [See post, p. 836.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.D.2d 757, 164 N.Y.S.2d 513, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spiezia-v-beach-51st-street-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1957.