Spiesel v. City of New York

Second Circuit

Spiesel v. City of New York

342 F.2d 800

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided March 30, 1965·No. No. 371, Docket 29398·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Charles Spiesel appeals from an order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York, Edward C. McLean, District Judge, dismissing on defendant’s motion, plaintiff’s complaint seeking damages against the City of New York for alleged actions of various unnamed police officers and sales tax personnel, on the ground that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We agree with the district court’s ruling on that branch of defendant’s motion and affirm the judgment dismissing the action, D.C., 239 F.Supp. 106.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Charles Spiesel appeals from an order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York, Edward C. McLean, District Judge, dismissing on defendant’s motion, plaintiff’s complaint seeking damages against the City of New York for alleged actions of various unnamed police officers and sales tax personnel, on the ground that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We agree with the district court’s ruling on that branch of defendant’s motion and affirm the judgment dismissing the action, D.C., 239 F.Supp. 106.

Spiesel v. City of New York, 342 F.2d 800 (2d Cir. 1965).

Pincite

342 F.2d 800 (Spiesel v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related