Spies v. Accessory Transit Co.

5 Duer 662
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided April 26, 1856·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bosworth, J.

The demurrer must be overruled. The husband need not be joined with the wife, when the action concerns her separate property. (Code, § 114.) Whether the plaintiff is a citizen of California or of New York, is of no consequence, so far as concerns the remedies and the forms of proceedings, when she prosecutes in the courts of this state. The demurrer admits the truth of the allegation, that the baggage was her separate property, and the court does not know that a California wife may not have a separate estate. The legal presumption is, that she may.

If the defendant has a right to be informed, by the complaint, of the particular facts which constitute the baggage her separate property, his remedy is by motion under § 160 of the Code. A demurrer will not reach such a defect, as the complaint is good in substance.

The defendant may answer, on paying the costs of the demurrer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spies v. Accessory Transit Co., 5 Duer 662 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1856).

5 Duer 662 (Spies v. Accessory Transit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nininger v. Board of County Commissioners
10 Minn. 133 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1865)