Spiers v. Zeigler

57 So. 699, 175 Ala. 664, 1912 Ala. LEXIS 125
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedFebruary 17, 1912
StatusPublished

This text of 57 So. 699 (Spiers v. Zeigler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spiers v. Zeigler, 57 So. 699, 175 Ala. 664, 1912 Ala. LEXIS 125 (Ala. 1912).

Opinion

McCLELLAN, j.

The sole assignment of error is that the court erred in overruling the demurrers of Julia E. and Nancy J. Spiers. The only objections, in substance, taken by these demurrers, go to the equity of the bill, which is filed by the executors of the last will and testament of Nancy Zeigler, deceased.

[667]*667With tlie bill, tlie will, in copy, is exhibited. After most ample averments pointing out the bases of doubt and uncertainty in the provisions of the will with respect to property devised or undertaken to be devised ■thereby, the bill seeks tlie aid of equity to construe the instrument and to direct the executors in the premises. Upon the authority of Ashurst v. Ashurst, Infra, 57 South. 442, delivered at this term — which ruling was rested upon Trotter v. Blocker, 6 Port. 269; Lakeview Co. v. Hannon, 93 Ala. 88, 9 South. 539; Tompkins v. Troy, 130 Ala. 555, 30 South. 512; Carroll v. Richardson, 87 Ala. 605, 6 South. 342, and authorities in each cited — it must be ruled that the bill in hand possesses equity, for the removal of the administration from the probate court, and for the construction of the bill of Nancy Zeigler,. deceased. It is not necessary to rehearse the evidence of complication and uncertainty which appears upon the face of the will, and to which the bill particularly refers.

The decree is affirmed.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carroll v. Richardson
87 Ala. 605 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1888)
Tompkins v. Troy
130 Ala. 555 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1900)
Trotter v. Blocker
6 Port. 269 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1838)
Ashurst v. Ashurst
57 So. 442 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 So. 699, 175 Ala. 664, 1912 Ala. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spiers-v-zeigler-ala-1912.