Spiers v. Willison

Supreme Court

Spiers v. Willison

8 U.S. 398, 2 L. Ed. 659, 4 Cranch 398, 1807 U.S. LEXIS 398

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 14, 1808

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 8 U.S. 398 (Spiers v. Willison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spiers v. Willison, 8 U.S. 398, 2 L. Ed. 659, 4 Cranch 398, 1807 U.S. LEXIS 398 (1808).

Pincite

Opinion

Marshall, Ch. J.

The error assigned consists in both the admission and the operation of the testimony. So far as evidence of the existence of a deed went to show the nature of the possession which accompanied the deed, so far it was admissible ; but it was not, in itself, evidence of any title in the plaintiff. There was no error, therefore, in admitting the testimony as to the deed.

But in overruling the prayer to instruct the jury, “ that at the time the gift was said to be made, no gift of a slave was valid, unless made in writing, which writing was afterwards reduced to record,” the court below is to be considered as having given an opinion that a parol gift was good. This court is, therefore, of opinion, that the court below erred, in refusing to give the latter part of the instruction prayed by the defendant.

This court gives no opinion, as to the validity of title acquired by possession.

Judgment reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI