Spiers v. Willison

8 U.S. 398, 2 L. Ed. 659, 4 Cranch 398, 1807 U.S. LEXIS 398
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 14, 1808·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Marshall, Ch. J.

The error assigned consists in both the admission and the operation of the testimony. So far as evidence of the existence of a deed went to show the nature of the possession which accompanied the deed, so far it was admissible ; but it was not, in itself, evidence of any title in the plaintiff. There was no error, therefore, in admitting the testimony as to the deed.

But in overruling the prayer to instruct the jury, “ that at the time the gift was said to be made, no gift of a slave was valid, unless made in writing, which writing was afterwards reduced to record,” the court below is to be considered as having given an opinion that a parol gift was good. This court is, therefore, of opinion, that the court below erred, in refusing to give the latter part of the instruction prayed by the defendant.

This court gives no opinion, as to the validity of title acquired by possession.

Judgment reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spiers v. Willison, 8 U.S. 398, 2 L. Ed. 659, 4 Cranch 398, 1807 U.S. LEXIS 398 (1808).

8 U.S. 398 (Spiers v. Willison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Stephenson
367 N.E.2d 1273 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1977)
Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. the Schafer Co.
138 S.E. 882 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1927)
Sharfsin v. United States
265 F. 916 (Fourth Circuit, 1920)
Sims v. Jones
20 S.E. 905 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1895)
Sprague v. . Hosmer
82 N.Y. 466 (New York Court of Appeals, 1880)
East v. Pace
57 Ala. 521 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1877)
Graham v. Lockhart
8 Ala. 9 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1845)
Hogan & Co. v. Reynolds
8 Ala. 59 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1845)
Cross v. Cross's adm'r
36 Va. 245 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1838)
Merrit v. Smith
6 Va. 486 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1835)
Lowry v. Pinson
18 S.C.L. 324 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1831)