Spiers v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Spiers v. State

552 S.W.2d 851, 1977 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1218

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 29, 1977

Docket53248

StatusPublished

Cited by24 cases

This text of 552 S.W.2d 851 (Spiers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spiers v. State, 552 S.W.2d 851, 1977 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1218 (Tex. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

BROWN, Commissioner.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted. Our prior PER CURIAM opinion is withdrawn.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault. The punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions under V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Sec. 12.42(d), was assessed at life imprisonment.

In support of the enhancement provisions of the indictment the State offered in evidence certified copies of two prior convictions in the State of Mississippi. One conviction was for burglary in cause number 2,658. The other was for assault with intent to commit murder in cause number 2,895. Although appellant admitted these two prior convictions, the burden was upon the State to prove that they were each final convictions. The record reveals that in the burglary conviction appellant’s sentence was suspended. There is no showing that this suspended sentence was ever revoked. Accordingly, there is no proof that the burglary conviction was a final conviction. Absent such proof such conviction cannot be used for enhancement. Arbuckle v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 371, 105 S.W.2d 219; Fetters v. State, 108 Tex.Cr.R. 282, 1 S.W.2d 312; Brittian v. State, 85 Tex.Cr.R. 491, 214 S.W. 351.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

BROWN, Commissioner.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted. Our prior PER CURIAM opinion is withdrawn.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault. The punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions under V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Sec. 12.42(d), was assessed at life imprisonment.

In support of the enhancement provisions of the indictment the State offered in evidence certified copies of two prior convictions in the State of Mississippi. One conviction was for burglary in cause number 2,658. The other was for assault with intent to commit murder in cause number 2,895. Although appellant admitted these two prior convictions, the burden was upon the State to prove that they were each final convictions. The record reveals that in the burglary conviction appellant’s sentence was suspended. There is no showing that this suspended sentence was ever revoked. Accordingly, there is no proof that the burglary conviction was a final conviction. Absent such proof such conviction cannot be used for enhancement. Arbuckle v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 371, 105 S.W.2d 219; Fetters v. State, 108 Tex.Cr.R. 282, 1 S.W.2d 312; Brittian v. State, 85 Tex.Cr.R. 491, 214 S.W. 351.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

552 S.W.2d 851, 1977 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spiers-v-state-texcrimapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack