Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Spier v. State

Spier v. State

15 S.E. 633, 89 Ga. 737
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 1, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 S.E. 633 (Spier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spier v. State, 15 S.E. 633, 89 Ga. 737 (Ga. 1892).

Opinion

[737]*737 Judgment affirmed.

Outside of the defendant’s statement there was no substantial conflict with what is above stated, except that there was some testimony to the effect that Gossett and Daniel treated the defendant roughly and that Gossett hit him with his club at the guard-house. The newly discovered testimony was, in brief, that the defendant was arrested in the railroad cut and not at the place testified to by Gossett and Daniel, and that he was walking towards his home when arrested, was not boisterous, and in returning to the guard-house he seemed to be struggling with Gossett. As to the third ground the third head-note is sufficient for this report. Stewart & Daniel and Dismuke & Mills, for plaintiff in error. J. H. Turner, solicitor-general, by Harrison & Peeples, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morakes v. State
40 S.E.2d 120 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 S.E. 633, 89 Ga. 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spier-v-state-ga-1892.