Spielvogel v. Welborne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Spielvogel v. Welborne

175 A.D.2d 830, 573 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10945

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 12, 1991

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 175 A.D.2d 830 (Spielvogel v. Welborne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spielvogel v. Welborne, 175 A.D.2d 830, 573 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10945 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action pursuant to Debtor and Creditor Law § 273-a to set aside a conveyance of real property, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lama, J.), entered October 17, 1989, which denied their motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted.

In their motion for summary judgment, the plaintiffs, who are judgment creditors of the defendant Jack Bergon, made a prima facie showing that Bergon’s transfer of real property to the defendant-respondent Elizabeth Welborne was fraudulent within the meaning of Debtor and Creditor Law § 273-a. In response to this motion, Welborne failed to adduce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to show that she had given fair consideration in return for the conveyance of this property to her. Welborne’s unsubstantiated allegations cannot be regarded as a substitute for admissible proof, and summary judgment should, therefore, have been granted in favor of the plaintiffs (see generally, Merman v Miller, 82 AD2d 826). Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Sullivan and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action pursuant to Debtor and Creditor Law § 273-a to set aside a conveyance of real property, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lama, J.), entered October 17, 1989, which denied their motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is granted.

In their motion for summary judgment, the plaintiffs, who are judgment creditors of the defendant Jack Bergon, made a prima facie showing that Bergon’s transfer of real property to the defendant-respondent Elizabeth Welborne was fraudulent within the meaning of Debtor and Creditor Law § 273-a. In response to this motion, Welborne failed to adduce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to show that she had given fair consideration in return for the conveyance of this property to her. Welborne’s unsubstantiated allegations cannot be regarded as a substitute for admissible proof, and summary judgment should, therefore, have been granted in favor of the plaintiffs (see generally, Merman v Miller, 82 AD2d 826). Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Sullivan and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 A.D.2d 830, 573 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spielvogel-v-welborne-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack