Spielfogel v. Fischer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Spielfogel v. Fischer

464 So. 2d 1310, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 687, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12916

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 13, 1985

DocketNo. 84-2577

StatusPublished

This text of 464 So. 2d 1310 (Spielfogel v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spielfogel v. Fischer, 464 So. 2d 1310, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 687, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12916 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying defendant/appellant’s motion to transfer the cause to the Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida (Dade County) is reversed since it is clear that the defendant, by asserting improper venue as an affirmative defense in the answer, did not waive this defense. See Rule 1.140(b), Fla.R.Civ.P.; see also Gross v. Franklin, 387 So.2d 1046 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Fixel v. Clevenger, 285 So.2d 687 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).

LETTS, HERSEY and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order denying defendant/appellant’s motion to transfer the cause to the Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida (Dade County) is reversed since it is clear that the defendant, by asserting improper venue as an affirmative defense in the answer, did not waive this defense. See Rule 1.140(b), Fla.R.Civ.P.; see also Gross v. Franklin, 387 So.2d 1046 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Fixel v. Clevenger, 285 So.2d 687 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).

LETTS, HERSEY and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

464 So. 2d 1310, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 687, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spielfogel-v-fischer-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack