Spiegel v. Kraus

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Spiegel v. Kraus

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 572

CourtOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati

DecidedJuly 23, 1923

DocketNo. 58672

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 572 (Spiegel v. Kraus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spiegel v. Kraus, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 572 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

MARX, J.,

Cin. Sup.

Epitomized Opinion

Kraus received certain lamp shades from Spiegel and had never returned them to Spiegel and still had possession of them. The evidence disclosed that the lamp shades were still worth the purchase price. The jury rendered a verdict for the purchase price. The court held:

1. “Kraus is not prejudiced in being required to pay the purchase price of the lamp shades.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARX, J.,

Cin. Sup.

Epitomized Opinion

Kraus received certain lamp shades from Spiegel and had never returned them to Spiegel and still had possession of them. The evidence disclosed that the lamp shades were still worth the purchase price. The jury rendered a verdict for the purchase price. The court held:

1. “Kraus is not prejudiced in being required to pay the purchase price of the lamp shades.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spiegel-v-kraus-ohsuperctcinci-1923.