Spiegel v. Kraus

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Spiegel v. Kraus

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 572

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati·Decided July 23, 1923·No. No. 58672·Published

Opinion

MARX, J.,

Cin. Sup.

Epitomized Opinion

Kraus received certain lamp shades from Spiegel and had never returned them to Spiegel and still had possession of them. The evidence disclosed that the lamp shades were still worth the purchase price. The jury rendered a verdict for the purchase price. The court held:

1. “Kraus is not prejudiced in being required to pay the purchase price of the lamp shades.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARX, J.,

Cin. Sup.

Epitomized Opinion

Kraus received certain lamp shades from Spiegel and had never returned them to Spiegel and still had possession of them. The evidence disclosed that the lamp shades were still worth the purchase price. The jury rendered a verdict for the purchase price. The court held:

1. “Kraus is not prejudiced in being required to pay the purchase price of the lamp shades.”

Spiegel v. Kraus, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 572 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1923).

Pincite

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 572 (Spiegel v. Kraus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.