Spiegel v. Fun-Tyme Ski & Sport Shop, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Spiegel v. Fun-Tyme Ski & Sport Shop, Inc.

100 A.D.2d 584, 473 N.Y.S.2d 345, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17562

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 100 A.D.2d 584 (Spiegel v. Fun-Tyme Ski & Sport Shop, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spiegel v. Fun-Tyme Ski & Sport Shop, Inc., 100 A.D.2d 584, 473 N.Y.S.2d 345, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17562 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), dated March 7, 1983, as, denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing defendant’s fourth affirmative defense. 11 Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, plaintiff’s motion granted, and the fourth affirmative defense dismissed. 1fThe release and hold harmless agreement on which the fourth affirmative defense is based fails, as a matter of law, to meet the standards set forth in Gross v Sweet (49 NY2d 102). Titone, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), dated March 7, 1983, as, denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing defendant’s fourth affirmative defense. 11 Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, plaintiff’s motion granted, and the fourth affirmative defense dismissed. 1fThe release and hold harmless agreement on which the fourth affirmative defense is based fails, as a matter of law, to meet the standards set forth in Gross v Sweet (49 NY2d 102). Titone, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A.D.2d 584, 473 N.Y.S.2d 345, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spiegel-v-fun-tyme-ski-sport-shop-inc-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack