Spiegel v. Flynn
This text of 24 A.D.2d 893 (Spiegel v. Flynn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action by a landowner to declare the nullity of the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Huntington insofar as it places plaintiff’s property partly in a residential, and partly in an industrial, district, and for injunctive relief, the defendants appeal, by permission of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, from so much of an order of that court, entered March 30, 1965, as denied their motion to renew, on additional facts, their prior motion to strike out as prejudicial certain allegations in the complaint. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. We do not pass on the weight of the evidence to be adduced at the trial. Christ, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 A.D.2d 893, 264 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spiegel-v-flynn-nyappdiv-1965.