Spiegel v. Dade County
This text of 567 So. 2d 558 (Spiegel v. Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The affirmance of Dade County resolution no. Z-270-89 is quashed only insofar as it includes the granting of a non-use parking variance (item 10) which had been withdrawn by the respondents during the course of the proceedings. See Metropolitan Dade County v. Betancourt, 559 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). The granting of that variance and any reference to it in the approved site plan shall be stricken from the resolution. Otherwise, the resolution and its affirmance by the circuit court are entirely approved.
Certiorari granted in part, denied in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
567 So. 2d 558, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7668, 1990 WL 149816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spiegel-v-dade-county-fladistctapp-1990.