Spiegel v. Dade County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Spiegel v. Dade County

567 So. 2d 558, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7668, 1990 WL 149816

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 9, 1990·No. No. 90-1816·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The affirmance of Dade County resolution no. Z-270-89 is quashed only insofar as it includes the granting of a non-use parking variance (item 10) which had been withdrawn by the respondents during the course of the proceedings. See Metropolitan Dade County v. Betancourt, 559 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). The granting of that variance and any reference to it in the approved site plan shall be stricken from the resolution. Otherwise, the resolution and its affirmance by the circuit court are entirely approved.

Certiorari granted in part, denied in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The affirmance of Dade County resolution no. Z-270-89 is quashed only insofar as it includes the granting of a non-use parking variance (item 10) which had been withdrawn by the respondents during the course of the proceedings. See Metropolitan Dade County v. Betancourt, 559 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). The granting of that variance and any reference to it in the approved site plan shall be stricken from the resolution. Otherwise, the resolution and its affirmance by the circuit court are entirely approved.

Certiorari granted in part, denied in part.

Spiegel v. Dade County, 567 So. 2d 558, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7668, 1990 WL 149816 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

567 So. 2d 558 (Spiegel v. Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related