Spiegel v. Cohen

186 Misc. 889, 62 N.Y.S.2d 70, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2186
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided April 4, 1946·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum Per Curiam.

Plaintiff failed to establish his first canse of action. He was not licensed as an electrician in New York City nor did he prove that he was employed by and worked under the supervision of a licensed person, partnership or corporation (Administrative Code of City of New York, § B30-17.0). Plaintiff’s proof as to the second cause of action was insufficient and failed to establish usury.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Shientag, McLaughlin and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spiegel v. Cohen, 186 Misc. 889, 62 N.Y.S.2d 70, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2186 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

186 Misc. 889 (Spiegel v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gargano v. Smith
97 Misc. 2d 535 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1978)
Moglen v. Gasper
4 Misc. 2d 368 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1956)