Spiegel v. Cohen

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Spiegel v. Cohen

186 Misc. 889, 62 N.Y.S.2d 70, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2186

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedApril 4, 1946

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 186 Misc. 889 (Spiegel v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spiegel v. Cohen, 186 Misc. 889, 62 N.Y.S.2d 70, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2186 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum Per Curiam.

Plaintiff failed to establish his first canse of action. He was not licensed as an electrician in New York City nor did he prove that he was employed by and worked under the supervision of a licensed person, partnership or corporation (Administrative Code of City of New York, § B30-17.0). Plaintiff’s proof as to the second cause of action was insufficient and failed to establish usury.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Shientag, McLaughlin and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI