Spicknall v. Maryland

Fourth Circuit

Spicknall v. Maryland

42 F. App'x 667

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 23, 2002·No. No. 02-1305·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lisa Marie Spicknall appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1983, 1985 (West Supp.2002) action. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Spicknall v. Maryland, No. CA-01-886-MJG (D.Md. Feb. 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Lisa Marie Spicknall appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1983, 1985 (West Supp.2002) action. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Spicknall v. Maryland, No. CA-01-886-MJG (D.Md. Feb. 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Spicknall v. Maryland, 42 F. App'x 667 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

42 F. App'x 667 (Spicknall v. Maryland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related